-
备注：已完结
类型：剧情片
主演：让-马克·巴尔 芭芭拉·苏科瓦 乌多·基尔 恩斯特-胡戈·贾勒加德 E
导演：拉斯·冯·提尔
语言：英语,德语
年代：未知
简介：“破浪而出"的丹麦导演拉尔斯．冯．特里厄扬名国际影坛的代表作，曾获坎城影展评审团大奖及高等技术委员会奖。 男主角是德裔美藉青年凯斯勒，在第二次世界大战后回到从未涉足的祖国。他原是一个和平主义和理想主义者，希望以中立的态度来看待战后的欧洲人民。不料叔叔安排凯斯勒在一列火车上当列车长，使他有机会深入欧洲各地，聆听各种不同的声音，从而揭破了和平口号与人道主义的虚妄。而他爱上的铁路公司老板千金，更是一名纳粹主义的支持者，更使他陷入了两难之境。 导演拍出一种令人目眩神迷的魔幻写实色彩，镜头运用大胆，使观众仿佛进入催眠状态之中，是一部个人艺术风格强烈之作。
-
备注：已完结
类型：剧情片
主演：艾琳.申科布莱恩 玛丽·里维埃 碧翠丝·罗曼德 Amira Chema
导演：埃里克·侯麦
语言：法语
年代：未知
简介：夏天快要来临的时候，巴黎女子戴尔芬（玛丽·瑞莱 Marie Rivière 饰）却陷入了忧伤与烦闷中。刚刚和前男友结束恋爱关系，本来约好与她一同度假的女友也放了她鸽子。尽管其它许多好心的亲友邀请她一同度假，但是她却一一拒绝了。每个人都有了自己的度假计划，只有她看似要独身 一人困在巴黎过冗长的夏天。她寻寻觅觅，终日游荡在各处，希望能够找到自己的情人，但是所遇之人皆不能触动她心。在马赛海边，她听说了关于绿光的传说：谁能看到绿光，谁就能得到幸福。落寞的她打算返回巴黎，在车站，一个男子对着正在阅读小说《白痴》的她微笑，戴尔芬似乎觉察到了什么，她主动邀请男子去海边看日落。在灿烂的光辉中，男子对她表白，而她却固执地等到绿光才给出答案。 本片获得第43届威尼斯电影节金狮奖。
-
备注：已完结
类型：喜剧片
主演：Matthew Broderick Jeanne Tripplehor
导演：沃伦·莱特
语言：英语
年代：未知
简介：Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.' By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses. Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together. One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around. While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken. Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
