备注:已完结
类型:喜剧片
主演:贡萨洛·沃丁顿 David Chan Cordeiro José Pi
语言:其它
年代:未知
简介:A satire on anti-communist paranoia in the days of fascist dictatorship in Portugal. The series follows the adventures of the Lusitanian superhero, the ultra-patriotic Captain Falcão, a man who follows the direct orders of António de Oliveira Salazar in the fight against the red menace. Starring Gonçalo Waddington, as Captain Falcão, David Chan Cordeiro (also responsible for coordinating the work of doubles) as his sidekick Puto Perdiz and José Pinto in the role of portuguese dictator, António de Oliveira Salazar.
备注:已完结
类型:剧情片
主演:斯蒂娜·艾克布罗德 安尼塔·布耶尔克 玛丽·理查德森 玛加丽塔·比斯特
导演:英格玛·伯格曼
语言:其它
年代:未知
简介:戏中,萨德本人从未露面,只存在于六名登场人物的对话中。人物的性格也很分明,西缅男爵夫人代表“美德”、而圣芳伯爵夫人代表“恶行”,门托纽夫人则代表了世俗。尽管两位代表善恶的人物更富有戏剧性,然而全剧的中心仍是主人公露涅和门托纽夫人的对立。 以剧中人对萨德的态度为例:门托纽夫人认为声名狼藉、锒铛入狱的萨德根本就是家庭的耻辱,而萨德的妻子露涅则截然不同,她真诚地等待着被社会排斥的丈夫,并认为这才是表达真爱的惟一方式。但是,当革命风起云涌,社会价值观也随之改变。萨德出狱并被捧为新时代的旗手,门托纽夫人的态度来了个一百八十度大转弯,她成了萨德的捧哏,称萨德为法国的献身者。 而露涅的态度却截然相反。丈夫重新被社会承认,意味着她那孤独的爱就此丧失了根基。不仅如此,她读了萨德在狱中写的小说,里面描写了一位坚持美德的女子的悲剧,露涅在作品中看到了自己的影子。她的孤独之爱从根底瓦解了,同时也意识到之前的半生不过是徒劳,于是她投身修道院,再也不与萨德相会。剧中露涅曾说:“与其付诸行动,不如创制法则……” 这句话也可以理解为“与其委身现实,不如付诸思想”。对原剧作者三岛先生来说,“艺术”无疑是存在于现实之外的、对于异端思想之美的例证。
备注:已完结
类型:剧情片
主演:克林特·伊斯特伍德 查理·辛 劳尔·胡里亚 索尼娅·布拉加 汤姆·斯凯
导演:克林特·伊斯特伍德
语言:英语
年代:未知
简介:尼克(克林特·伊斯特伍德 Clint Eastwood 饰)是一名警察,负责侦破汽车团伙盗窃工作,可是,在这个岗位上这么久了,尼克连一宗案件都没有破获过,这让他在同事们面前有些抬不起头来。一次偶然中,尼克发现一个名叫飓风(劳尔·胡里亚 Raul Julia 饰)的男人有可能是汽车盗窃团伙背后的主使,这让尼克来了精神,这或许是他立功的唯一一次机会了。 就这样,尼克和搭档开始了对于案件的追踪,哪知道在交锋中,尼克的搭档不幸殉职了,这宗案件因为牵扯到了杀人事件,而被归类成为了谋杀案,尼克失去了案件的调查权,但这个固执的男人,又怎么会让到嘴边的鱼白白溜走呢。
备注:已完结
类型:剧情片
主演:让-马克·巴尔 芭芭拉·苏科瓦 乌多·基尔 恩斯特-胡戈·贾勒加德 E
导演:拉斯·冯·提尔
语言:英语,德语
年代:未知
简介:“破浪而出"的丹麦导演拉尔斯.冯.特里厄扬名国际影坛的代表作,曾获坎城影展评审团大奖及高等技术委员会奖。 男主角是德裔美藉青年凯斯勒,在第二次世界大战后回到从未涉足的祖国。他原是一个和平主义和理想主义者,希望以中立的态度来看待战后的欧洲人民。不料叔叔安排凯斯勒在一列火车上当列车长,使他有机会深入欧洲各地,聆听各种不同的声音,从而揭破了和平口号与人道主义的虚妄。而他爱上的铁路公司老板千金,更是一名纳粹主义的支持者,更使他陷入了两难之境。 导演拍出一种令人目眩神迷的魔幻写实色彩,镜头运用大胆,使观众仿佛进入催眠状态之中,是一部个人艺术风格强烈之作。
备注:已完结
类型:喜剧片
主演:Matthew Broderick Jeanne Tripplehor
导演:沃伦·莱特
语言:英语
年代:未知
简介:Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.' By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses. Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together. One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around. While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken. Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...